No, because the only thing we knew was the fact that he was a person of interest, that we couldn't charge him, and that he wasn't linked to al-Qaeda. The mistakes were not briefed up because the investigators didn't believe they had made a mistake, and that's what they testified to before Justice O'Connor.
For example, there is one point that Justice O'Connor talks about. In the amount of time between when Mr. Arar sold his house and went to Tunisia, there was a five-month gap. The investigators remarked in their notes that Mr. Arar departed suddenly from Canada. Justice O'Connor, in his conclusion, says it wasn't sudden--five months is not sudden--but that's a conclusion he draws at the end of the inquiry. The investigator didn't think that was a mistake. That was one of the inaccuracies and that was the issue here. These disparate little pieces of misinformation or errors were not seen as errors at the time, until Justice O'Connor did the comprehensive audit and brought it together and arrived at this conclusion.