As I said, based on Justice O'Connor's report, we now have a very rigid governance structure, which means that no information is shared outside of the RCMP without a series of vetting and review in headquarters. Then, that information is only shared once the most senior officers review it to make sure that all the policies are followed and are complete. That is a very rigorous and centralized governance structure.
We have extensive training now for members to be very sensitive to the fact that when you label someone, especially in a national security area, you can make a serious mistake or it can have serious repercussions if you're not very careful. This is something that we are taking even beyond our national security area. So there is a very rigid learning process.
The exchange of information is very tightly controlled. The training is much better now. We have new MOUs with CSIS. We have a very rigid and very detailed MOU so that we understand what each other is doing. We have actually put in place and are well down the road to incorporating all the lessons that we have learned from Justice O'Connor. That's why, although we can never guarantee, I believe we are a long way down the road to ensuring that this type of mistake never happens again.
But I must also come back to the point that Justice O'Connor made about the investigators. He said they were hard-working, dedicated investigators. They made honest mistakes. They didn't have any mal-intent. They did not do this with any intention to hurt anyone. They were doing the best they could in an environment that was very charged and very difficult. That is why Justice O'Connor, I believe, is very fair in terms of accountability. He takes into consideration the whole context in which they were operating and he gives us lessons learned, and he gives us the proper recommendations so that we don't do this again.