Mr. Chairman, again I go back to my previous answer. I tried to inform myself as best I could from reading the report. I wanted to appear as quickly as possible. I've indicated that I may not have totally represented the facts as they were, but Justice O'Connor, in his report, very clearly states that no senior officers were aware of these mistakes or this mislabelling—none of us were. We only found out after Justice O'Connor brought all of these things together through his exhaustive analysis.
I use the analogy of an audit, Mr. Chairman. An audit often goes into a large organization and takes disparate pieces of information and brings them together, and then we can see the picture. Mr. Arar was neither innocent nor guilty for us; he was a person of interest from the beginning right till the end of the report. Again, Justice O'Connor states that we had every right to consider him a person of interest throughout this ordeal, and that's what I've tried to clarify here today.