Also, I think the record is very clear. I have used humour at times to try to deflect what is an outrageous and at times equally humorous approach that one person likes to take--it's well known that he takes certain approaches, and I find at times that his approach is somewhat laughable. But in terms of what happened to Mr. Arar, I think you--well, I know you won't retract it--are absolutely wrong in terms of thinking I made any kind of humorous reflection on what happened to Mr. Arar. That is wrong. That is an absolutely false characterization. I'll continue to use humour from time to time when people are using sarcasm on me, just to try to expose that.
But there is nothing humorous in what happened to Mr. Arar. There's nothing humorous about the fact that this continued for so many years without being addressed. We are very concerned about that, and we are not the government that was there when the affair took place; we're the government taking action to make sure it never happens again.