Yes I do, Mr. Chair, thank you.
Thank you, Ms. Bloodworth and Mr. Elliott, for being here.
There has been something bothering me with regard to the commissioner's two different testimonies. It involves the knowledge he would have had around claims for national security and documents not being disclosed. I don't have the page here, sorry, but in his report Justice O'Connor actually makes some reference to this--of course because he's irritated by it.
I'm wondering who makes the decision when a claim is made for a national security classification on material. I'm asking that particularly with regard to the watch list. Who would be the person determining that national security applies to that material, if it did in fact apply or if there was a claim for that, which I understand there was?