Perhaps I can add something, Mr. Ménard. I actually believe that whatever he felt was not clear, he should have come back and clarified. So I'm not sure I would....
I don't have his testimony in front of me, so I can't pick out one example, but I would say that as a general principle, for any of us who appear, if there's anything we've said that has been unclear, or, when we go back, we say, gee, we didn't really mean that, we made a mistake, then we should clarify that. I'm not sure I'd pick out anything said before a parliamentary committee and say, oh well, that doesn't matter; yes it was unclear, and it wasn't really a fact, but you shouldn't clarify it.
So I think that may be why we're having a little trouble with the question. I don't think we'd pick and choose in that way.