Yes, but if I may, the letter was clearly contradictory. You were surprised by the evidence that was before September 28, yet you didn't have conversations with Minister Day. Well, one has to suspend belief to think that you weren't in some way passing these thoughts along.
Then we had Minister Day, who was saying he stood 100% behind the commissioner, who later said in December that the first point when he realized there were questions about the testimony of Commissioner Zaccardelli was Monday, December 5. That was the first point at which he said he knew there were questions.
What you're saying is that as far back as September 28, and certainly on November 4 or November 5 when you saw the letter, you knew there were questions. Are you saying that the minister is that incompetent that he wasn't capable of understanding and seeing those questions, and that you were not relaying these concerns or questions at that point in time?
I'm trying to understand why these questions or concerns wouldn't have been there and why the minister would have said he was so shocked on December 5.