This will probably be a very frustrating answer for members of the committee.
What we have done in the context of the committee is to come to substantial agreement on what the problems are and perhaps how they ought to be properly addressed. But those are policy issues, frankly, and some kind of ministerial direction or position is going to have to be taken on them before we can actually identify them specifically. Those choices haven't been made; they're not our prerogative, if you like, as public servants.
You've heard from various members of the panel this morning on what some of those problems were. Perhaps identifying a problem suggests an answer. For example, the Canada Border Services Agency isn't authorized to intercept counterfeit or pirated goods at the border. That problem suggests an answer. Our trademark legislation doesn't have an offence analogous to the offence in the Copyright Act. That problem suggests an answer.
I could go on here. The problems that have been identified to some extent at the table today also suggest what kind of answer would be appropriate. I'm very conscious of the fact that our role here today has to be descriptive rather than prescriptive because ministers have not made the prescriptive choices, the policy choices, with respect to these issues.