I think part of the answer to your question is that this has to do with counterfeit, or at least the title has to do with it. I believe we do actually have someone from Heritage Canada as our backup if there were issues raised, but this was supposed to be about public health and safety risks. To the extent that, yes, there are organized crime elements dealing with copyrighted goods, there is that piracy element, but we had focused our presentation mostly on the health risks of counterfeit goods, counterfeit pharmaceuticals, things like that.
With respect to where they stand in the working group, they are an essential part of the working group. They are there, along with all of the other agencies and departments, at every meeting we have interdepartmentally. We have a very broad consensus, really, on what needs to be done. There is no dissent among the departments or agencies involved; we do need to update our regime, and we're trying to look at the specifics, the details, even the broad strokes of what we need to do. We're trying to look at the resources, the types of changes that probably need to be made in the legislation. There is no dissent in the group.