I'd just like to follow up.
Mr. Comartin has frequently mentioned the issue with the press. I think I heard comments that there are inaccuracies in the press report. I don't know whether this is a fair question, but is it fair to say that there's been some licence taken in the writing of the report, as to what was said or not said? If that is the case and if there are questions about it, I think perhaps what Mr. Norlock is saying is that the right way to deal with it here is to get the basis of where that report came from, the factual side.