My understanding in both these cases is that there were pictures taken as these two individuals were going into court, and that's how they were identified—the Hells Angels. I'm quite sure that's what happened, and he was so notorious that a number of people recognized him in the picture, so that did tie both his former identity and his protective identity since we knew who the person was who was going through the door of the courtroom at the time the picture was taken.
Is that not a breach, and why was the newspaper not charged?