I should add to that perhaps. What distinguishes this index as different from other indices is the humanitarian component and of course the voluntary nature. It's so important to have the consent properly established at the beginning. The training and the collection of those samples are part and parcel. It's very similar to, for instance, a mass disaster.
We were involved with the identification of the victims of Swissair. We also had to develop a very sound consent form enabling us to go forward and make any identifications, but at the same time, the people who were providing the samples to us were very comfortable in what we were doing and what we should not be doing. What distinguishes this index is...it's like a long-term mass disaster. You have a lot of missing people over a period of time.
My counterparts, for instance, in the United States have faced similar situations, and it's interesting to look at the various states involved. For instance, some states are very concerned about the privacy and security, as they should be, of their citizens. On the other hand, I would say that they also balance that with the prospect of making identification. So, for instance, in Florida, my colleagues there have designed a consent form that establishes what can or cannot be searched based on the permission of those individuals providing the sample up front. It would very much be a case of establishing the trust of the individuals in trying to find your missing loved one, but at the same time following the rules that are in place within that consent form.
So part and parcel of this whole process will be establishing the rights and privileges and respecting those at the very front end, and we hope a proper consent form will do so.