I'm glad you mentioned that. I think the underlying issue with the other half of your example, which is the $10 watch, is that by not taking action, by implicitly accepting that this is okay—I don't know if that was inherent in your question or not, but if one assumes that inaction could lead to that, we are encouraging individuals in our society to take the view that if there is what they might personally consider a victimless crime, what's the harm? They're saying, what am I doing wrong? For something that costs a lot of money, I'm getting a good deal. I'm a smart guy. I'm a smart buyer.
