I can confirm what Mr. Judd is saying with regard to our intention being turned into the reality of working very closely together, and the issue of whether something is a national security issue for an intelligence purpose or when it becomes criminal is something that we work very closely together on to make sure that gap does not exist. I also agree with him from a legislative perspective. We are still struggling with the issue of intelligence versus evidence and the admissibility of that in a court of prosecution.
On May 15th, 2007. See this statement in context.