In response to your question on the terms of reference, the area they're explicitly not mandated to review is the issue of privatization of institutions. That's explicitly removed from the terms of reference. If I can do it very generally, they're really looking at the soundness of CSC's business plans and its priorities, as well as its resource capability to carry out those priorities to achieve its objectives.
We have a major infrastructure problem. We have 58 institutions. Some were built in the 1800s. Most of them are over 40 years of age, and they need some fairly significant maintenance. The question the review will look at is whether we are looking at the issue of patching, or whether we are looking at a new approach, for example, to infrastructure. They've also been asked to look at some of the effectiveness of our programs in the community and in the institutions--the effectiveness of aboriginal programs, as an example.