I can't speak to labour-management issues, Chairman. Certainly when people are more qualified to do more things, we can surmise that this may enter into discussions, but it's not our position to get involved. That's a labour-management issue. That could well be, but there are the offsetting costs.
When you look at the economic analysis of what happens, for instance, at White Rock when the border shuts down, when they receive notice that there's someone armed and dangerous approaching and they can't properly protect the public because they're not armed, you know what happens. If that happens at a major port of entry, like Detroit-Windsor, for instance, within four hours factories start closing down their production lines because of just-in-time delivery. So when you look at the offset to those types of incidents not happening, you can make a case quite quickly that this is revenue-positive. But those begin to be a little speculative.
These are costs, and as you break them down, you get to see that a lot more is being purchased than simply an actual firearm.