Yes, it's fair to say. And I indicated that the recommendations were made in 1992--the legislation was 1995--and part of the challenge at that time was the articulation of criteria and so on. In June 1996, the legislation was passed. It mapped out criteria and so on. That certainly helped a bit, and I think it's fair to say that over time policies have been put in place to regularize it a bit.
The formal response at the time, and certainly of the nature you have indicated, which is that recommendations are not binding, they're merely advisory.... We could give you an edited version of the response that came back with reference to the recommendations itemized in detail, but it was very much that they were to be taken under advisement.