Thank you. I do.
I noted the difference in your internal analysis on the suicide, and I'm not a suicide expert, but one of the things that often occurs is isolation of individuals. My understanding, prior to your testimony, was that the isolation from relatives is a determinant over time of people returning and taking themselves out of the program.
I was really shocked, actually, when you said you had up to 25 people, because I thought our experience in Canada was that it's a very limited group of people; it would be, I think for the most part, the immediate family, so spouse, child, but certainly not grandparents.
I understood you saying, Mr. Shur, that you will take anyone in that grouping who is at risk. I only want to clarify that point so there is no misunderstanding here. The wide grouping on the family is not because you're taking all of the extended family; it's because that particular extended family had great risk to itself as a unit. Is that correct?