Right, and it's also a possibility that the one guy, out of the five or six, has not been involved with crime. I had a very notorious case that resolved a few years ago. It made headlines. It was the brother of the national president of the international Outlaws bikers association. He could not stand what his brother was doing and he infiltrated the bikers—this is all reported—and in the final analysis many were convicted, including his brother.
Now, sure, there was a big involvement, but he had no criminal past, and his several family members were part of it. It isn't necessarily the case that the head of the family or the main person has been involved with crime.
The thing is that some of these people are treated so shabbily it would be a wonder if they didn't turn to crime because of the way they're treated. I have one now, who's not even in Canada, who can't get welfare because it would disclose his name. How is a person like that going to live?