Absolutely. If you say you are going to review it on a five-year period basis, there should be a provision in there—and I'm not going to do it off the top of my head because that wouldn't be meaningful—that the information you require—And it's not catch as catch can, not that the RCMP said that they're going to do better next year and give you more information. I think that maybe this committee, if it decides it should recommend to Parliament that there be a five-year review, could at the same time say what type of statistical data should be available to you in order to do a meaningful review.
On June 5th, 2007. See this statement in context.