I am sorry to interrupt you, Mr. Bulmer, but you have spoken for a long time, and I would like to ask you at least one other question.
You raise a point that I find very intriguing. If one of those witnesses commits a crime, his or her fingerprints will be taken when the charge is laid. From what I know, none of those witnesses have their fingerprints changed, is that right?
So we will know who has committed other crimes in the past. You seem to be saying that if this person commits another crime, the judge will not know what other crimes the person has committed in the past. It seems to me that with the fingerprint system we have, the judge will know. The judge will know that the person has committed other crimes under a different name.
Is that not how things work?