I get that.
I'm sorry, but we're in five-minute rounds and it limits my questioning. Thank you.
Last week we heard some testimony that suggested it would be a good idea to have a periodic parliamentary review of the act. Right now, you have the act, and really this it the first time since the implementation of the act that we've had any looking at this.
One of the periods suggested was a parliamentary review every five years. I'd like comments from both of you on whether you think that would be useful, also knowing that there are many things that we don't get to hear because of the secrecy involved in the program.