You're right. The difficulty is that there's only one agency in the country that can provide secure documentation, and that comes under the Witness Protection Program Act, the federal act, and it's the RCMP that looks after securing the secure identification. In the process right now, when these other agencies choose to actually move somebody with a secure identification, they're forced, basically, to come into the program.
I guess there are a few different options. One would be to amend the act and to allow the RCMP to obtain secure documentation for these other agencies, but we would not have responsibility, essentially, for those cases. So there would be a clause that would say you're allowed to provide this secure identification; however, the person doesn't technically come under the act.
The problem with that, of course, is that when you look back to why the act was originally created, the act was created to protect the witnesses, and they wanted to have a structured program that would bring witnesses under the full protection of the act. One of the key areas of protection under the Witness Protection Program Act is the disclosure side, and that's the only act, of course, that has addressed disclosure and said that it's a criminal offence to disclose.