I'm not sure how to answer that. When the facts of the case out of British Columbia are examined, everybody will have a much better understanding of what happened at that point, and clearly in that investigation there were mistakes made. We'll lay that out and say here are the areas where we could have done a better job.
I don't know that there would be any advantage, but I speak only because I know both sides of the file and have seen what went on from the point the person entered the program onward. I am aware of how that case was handled, and I can't imagine any way that we could have possibly prevented what happened in that case.