The act doesn't provide an exhaustive list of what some of the examples are, but in my personal interpretation—and I'm not a lawyer, I'm a police officer—it seems to me that the act is trying to guide the police that when you have to be proactive, when the investigation is ongoing, when you have to either capture somebody or do something to further that investigation, and you have to make a disclosure, then bring that information to the commissioner so that we can legally make that disclosure. I don't see anything that would indicate, once the person is captured, in custody, convicted, that it's almost like a sanction that you could say okay, now we're going to release that name. I don't see it there.
On June 7th, 2007. See this statement in context.