That's absolutely correct. Sections 9 and 10 deal with termination. Termination, in fact, in my interpretation of the act, is not regarded as as serious a matter as the termination of a protectee from the witness protection program. It is not regarded as as serious a matter as the disclosure of the identity or location of a protectee. Terminating an individual simply stops the agreement and the obligations that the RCMP have with regard to further protection, but the person then retains their status as a former protectee, and former protectees' information is kept at exactly the same status as that of a protectee. So the same steps have to be afforded to a former protectee, with regard to disclosure, as are afforded to a protectee.
On June 7th, 2007. See this statement in context.