Okay.
So when we look at this, we're not looking at—and I think you used these words before—petty criminals at all; we're looking at people from a specific, narrow perspective who are threats to Canadians' safety. So we get all tied up in some other “what if?” situations. They're not really valid. What's valid, and I don't disagree with my colleagues, is that some people for whatever reason will end up on the list. But if we have faith in the system—and that's why we're here, to build that faith in the system—we have to understand and you have to get us convinced that the system is very narrowly focused and there will be few people on that list.
I think what we're looking for is some sense that we're looking for that narrow focus, aviation safety, not somebody who's a petty criminal ending up on the list who might have multiple name matches in Canada. We're looking at Canadians; we're not looking at the Americans. We don't want to offend anybody, but at the same time, it's the safety of Canadians and it's the inconvenience to Canadians. So I think you need to convince us that it is a very narrow focus: it is purely on aviation safety.