Okay.
All of us talk about the different levels. So this is implemented; Canadians know it, terrorists know it, and I'm sure everyone knows it. But when we talk about a level and deterring people, I know from a little background previously that sometimes a little sticker on a window deters people from breaking into buildings, and I think you used that analogy when you talked about the stolen car.
So I recognize what you're saying is that this is just one other part of the whole equation, and I think Canadians also understand that there are different forms of deterrents that are extremely...if not impossible, very difficult to measure in terms of effectiveness. But I think it is a given that knowledge becomes somewhat of a deterrent, and I, for one, think the right decision was made in 2004 to go ahead with this kind of program--not that it will be perfect, but we can fix it as we go ahead.
So it's my opinion that from the perspective of Canadians, this might turn out to be a good start. It might be the perfect start. But at least it does provide some protection for Canadians.
You don't have to respond to that. That's just my statement.