Okay.
I would come back to the first explanations and arguments you gave us today. There is no single thing that can be done that can completely guarantee security. Security is best ensured by a set of measures that complement one another. I understand that argument perfectly. That is not where the question lies.
The question is what additional protection this gives us as compared to the disadvantages. I am still wondering what danger a terrorist who has been searched, and who we are sure has nothing on him or her, or in his or her luggage, can present once on board a plane. Can you give us an evaluation, that will necessarily be very subjective, of the additional security that no-fly lists provide as compared to security measures consisting of searches and examinations before boarding?
New technologies enable us to take the equivalent of x-rays, but in millionths of a second. They can even detect plastic weapons, in the same way as current technology can detect metal weapons. What more does this give us? The person may indeed be a terrorist, but if the person is not carrying a weapon, what danger does he or she present?