We believe there should be a shared responsibility. I think there is a cost of doing business, there's no question, to secure these products, and that also benefits the employees and the workers in terms of safety. It keeps our costs down and costs of operation for insurance purposes. So we do have a benefit. We do believe there's some moral and social responsibility for our industry to pony up with some co-investment, but we believe it should be a shared approach, a partnership with the government.
Actually, if you really come down to it, we believe that industry, all levels of industry, not just the retailer but the manufacturers, should be playing a role in some investment. If ultimately we were to suggest a final solution, you may want to include industry, the manufacturers of fertilizers, in a proposed sharing agreement, almost 50-50, if you will: 50% government, 25% from manufacturing, and 25% from retailers. If there were the ultimate decision and I thought that would be the most practical approach, that would be my suggestion.
I do believe the government has a role. Our members believe they have a role because it is Canadians who benefit ultimately from the public safety enhancement. But we are prepared to share in the cost of investment.