I do not quite know how to say it, but I do know that terrorists are targeting agricultural products. You are arguing that it should not necessarily be up to farmers to cover the costs of the measures implemented for the sake of the general public. For example, in large cities, it is the municipality, not the merchants, who pay for police officers to patrol the streets. You feel that the government, not the farmers, should cover this expense. Am I correct?
On June 19th, 2007. See this statement in context.