There is absolutely no relationship at all. The work stoppage situation was related to employees feeling vulnerable because there was information that somebody dangerous might come in at a border point, and as you say, not being armed, our officers felt vulnerable. We've had situations like that, and we might have more of those situations, because we will not be able to have completely deployed armed operations for many years.
The question of the lookout and information that's available to our officers is a very complex one. Many pieces of information are analyzed by people who are behind the border, who are in some specific centres across the country--intelligence officers--and we also have a national risk assessment centre. And that's where the information is analyzed. It uses input from our sister agencies in the field of security. It uses input from the police on occasion, and very often, in fact every day, input from similar agencies in the U.S.
All that information is analyzed, and using that information and also the commercial information we get, and pulling that together, is how decisions are made about looking at somebody in particular, looking at a container in particular, or worrying, because of safety considerations, about one individual or another. But it has absolutely nothing to do with being worried about work stoppages.