But I'm going back to a statement you made earlier, though, which was interesting because you said three things, and they got me thinking and a little bit off-track. You said, first, that the legislation, if placed in the House now, will not pass, so therefore why bring it; secondly, that there'd be an amnesty until next May, at which time hopefully there would be a new law, and in which case then they would comply with the new law. What I'm reading from this is that the government has decided that because it can't pass legislation in the House, it's chosen not to table it, to amend the existing legislation, and it's giving long gun owners amnesty so they don't have to register until next May, at which time the government hopes to have a law in place that will then never allow them to have to register.
That's what I understood you to say a few minutes ago. Am I right?