An oversight committee is clearly something we want. The work that was done by parliamentarians in the last Parliament was very helpful. A lot of ground was covered. I've had some discussions with a number of individuals, some of whom were actually on that committee previously, with a variety of party affiliations.
In terms of timelines, at this point we're looking towards the fall. I don't know that we can do what we'd like to do in the remainder of this session. I was very impressed with the high degree of collegiality of members who were previously working on this, from all parties. I'm convinced that we can come up with something that's satisfactory.
Regarding your question on the British approach vis-à-vis the American, as a matter of fact the committee looked at, and we will continue to look at, a number of different models. The key factor is that members of Parliament from all parties would be able to look at certain security and intelligence information--they would be sworn to secrecy, of course, under the usual provisions of that line of work--to build confidence among all parliamentarians and among Canadians that the necessary steps are being taken to provide security, with a balanced approach of safety and security being achieved, but also carefully observing privacy rights, human rights, and individual freedoms. I look forward to moving forward on that approximate timeline.