Thank you.
The three pages have three different amendments, but they all work together. They're amending the provisions with respect to the special advocate. Under this, as I understand it, after hearing presentations from the permanent resident or the foreign national and the minister, and after giving particular consideration and weight to the preferences of the permanent resident or foreign national—obviously there will be an opportunity to be heard—the judge appoints the special advocate, if there seem to be no problems, such as those enumerated on the second page of this amendment.
I'm satisfied with that, because sometimes some individuals could refuse to appoint any one of the 20 special advocates who might be on the list, or might want to change every other day, or there might be conflicts and other problems, and the judges need that discretion. This clearly says that it's the preference of the detainee that has to be kept in mind while appointing. I think that's an important principle.
The problem I have is with the third page. We've heard presentations here from Mr. Waldman, Mr. Forcese, and others that we should have....
Sometimes there are unorthodox ways of working here.