Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I want to raise an issue. Actually, Mr. Ménard raised it with me privately earlier. He's not raising it. He's trying to sort out all his own amendments.
One of the things I would caution against...let me give you a scenario. Someone is tortured and they supply certain information, but in that information they indicate, let's say, that there's a cache of information in some hideaway somewhere, not to be overly melodramatic. But the authorities, the police, go to that location--that information is obtained under torture, that's not in debate--and they find the smoking gun or information that clearly points to a certain direction and some criminal acts or otherwise. I just think we need to be careful with the wording, that we wouldn't exclude that kind of evidence, that kind of information, which was derived under torture but which led to some other information that is useful and could be creating an issue in terms of public safety for Canadians.