Everyone has read the amendment, I imagine.
Essentially, the purpose of this amendment is to provide an ability, before the Federal Court of Appeal, that is similar to what any criminal accused has, and not only on a question of law, as is proposed. What is proposed is a question of law that is stated by the person whose decision is the subject of an appeal.
We have a good enough relationship that I do not have to repeat the essential points in the arguments I have already made, but which are [Editor's Note: Inaudible]. In my opinion, we must have just as many guarantees, because of the consequences that attach to the decision that is made.
I do have an additional argument, however. I find it extremely difficult, myself, to accept the possibility that a person could be sentenced to an indefinite term based on the opinion of a single person. There should be a broader appeal.
As well, this is the person who made the decision that it is sought to appeal. I do not believe that this will inspire great confidence in the person concerned. I remember that there could be appeals from summary convictions when I was...