I was too broad in my characterization. What I'm trying to say is that there will be overlaps in the facts of cases that may lead to this concern with tainting. I'm trying to describe what they might be, but I'm not saying that simply because a special advocate played the role for country X, he would automatically be disqualified from representing the interests of a person from the same country in a future case. You would have to look at all of the information and determine whether there is this risk of tainting by inadvertence.
On December 7th, 2007. See this statement in context.