Inasmuch as I want to agree with my colleague, Mr. Ménard—we used to be attorneys general together a long time ago—I disagree. I think Mr. Ménard's motion does not import the concept of solicitor-client privilege to the extent of imposing the obligation on the special advocate to actually provide information, disclose information to the law enforcement authorities with respect to any commission of a crime that might be contemplated.
To that extent, I would forgo our motion as well, because it is not as well worded as the motion from the government. The motion from the government, G-5, imports and actually excludes the solicitor-client relationship, and then deems it back for a specific purpose, therefore deeming back the obligation on the special advocate not to disclose any future crime information. I think that is more neatly done, and I'm prepared to abandon or withdraw our motion.