I think I made a point last time, and I'll make it again: nothing in the motions from the last sitting exists with respect to this matter. This is brand new. It is unnecessary, as pointed out by my colleague. The history of this committee, and generally of Parliament, tells us that government bills are given the attention they deserve--maybe not at the immediate next meeting, but a couple of meetings afterward.
We're all governed by common sense, and I just don't think this is--we're not going to support it. It's not the case that the government should be able to tell the committee what to do. I don't think it's within the accepted bounds of parliamentary procedure and convention.