Clearly, as I pointed out in my opening submission, civilian oversight brings a different perspective. You can be what they call acculturated. I understand that if you're a police officer, you're going to get in and do things as your peers who are in a similar position do and have their perspective. Our value should be to bring the perspective of a broader community.
Should there in fact be a level of oversight? Clearly. Your comment is whether there is a different level of use among police. Yes, there is. I think Toronto appeared before you. You look at who they give it to. It's a front-line sergeant. We deal with RCMP constables fresh out who have it. They're going to train them out at Depot Division on taser use. The front-line sergeant is going to have experience using various things and judgment.
The other thing is having specialized teams and fewer devices. The RCMP has almost 3,000 devices and over 9,000 members trained. You have a large base; therefore, you're going to have a dynamic in place. We would like to do on a regular basis what we're doing now, which is get that data and look at it and then provide advice back to the RCMP. Is it a problem in stun use or taser use? Is it a problem in a locale? Is it a problem with an individual officer? You have to know that, because it comes down to individual behaviour.