In your presentation as well, Mr. Savard, you said there's insufficient data to conclude that the taser is completely safe. What I thought I heard Ms. Hall say is that there's insufficient data to conclude that the taser is more dangerous than other interventions—the pepper spray or physical constraints. In other words, I think that in coming at it differently, you're saying similar things: that more data is needed, more study. This would lead one to conclude, it seems to me, that it would not be unreasonable for this committee or the government to say that while there is this uncertainty, the way the taser is applied and the way it's used, in terms of the rules of engagement, should be very carefully constructed.
Would that be a fair comment?