I think it's absolutely part of the question as to what the use-of-force continuum is, where you can use any particular weapon or any device.
At the earliest point, a police officer, by being there in a uniform, is the first line of defence. His second line of defence is the mere touching of someone and asking them to come along with him. Beyond that come the next steps, and you're quite right: when should they be using the taser, as opposed to, in the case of Mr. Dziekanski, if they were so worried, why would they not have used, for example, pepper spray? Those are excellent questions. Or when might the baton be used?
Those are all things that have to be considered in the context of where and when and if you're going to allow the taser to be used as a weapon, because clearly, if the police are going to use it at the level they're using it at now in the continuum of force, Canadians have a problem. I believe this committee ought to have a problem with that as well.