In terms of heads of organizations, I would respond that it's both. Ultimately our aim is to arrest and bring to justice the head of the organization, not necessarily the person who is managing whatever manufacturer is operating in Canada or in the U.S. As I explained earlier, it's a balanced approach. We are targeting the different levels of the organization, but ultimately we realize that if we don't interdict the person who is actually responsible for the operation, the operation will continue.
On May 7th, 2008. See this statement in context.