First of all, let me give you a little bit of a strategy on your first question, because I would like to give a little bit of input on it too.
I think there's another strong strategy that the industry as a whole could help out with. If you really want to stop the amount of raw material that gets out from a tobacco perspective, the large tobacco companies, including ourselves, could commit to buying more of the domestically grown tobacco, as opposed to getting it from cheaper alternative sources. If we all purchased domestically grown tobacco and allowed them to have a long-term phase-out program, even if it meant additional amounts of money on each carton, it would help the Canadian tobacco farmer. My personal belief is that that's where about 80% of the actual tobacco is coming from in this contraband activity anyway. You can't have people growing 70 million pounds and all of a sudden just abandon them because tobacco is cheaper in Brazil or someplace else. We have a responsibility to help them in their phase-out program, as Canadian tobacco manufacturers, if we truly are interested in tackling the problem.
Second, there is no possible way in the world that anybody can tell you that.... I've got it outlined here, but I'll just show everybody a picture, just to show you. You can see that cigarette paper is clearly defined for one use. Tipping paper, the brown cork stuff on the edge of the cigarette, is clearly defined for one use. Acetate tow, to the best of my knowledge, is only.... If it is for alternative uses, then identify what those uses are and restrict it.
I still stand firmly in the position I had when I walked into this meeting, which is that if you control the raw materials, you'll control the activities, because anyone who is doing it in a legal form is not afraid of transparency.