I'll take one portion of it, and anyone else who wants to can come in afterwards.
You talk about Canadian laws. I think that statement is an example of the fundamental misconception about who we are. We'll never be Canadian citizens, regardless of what documents we carry, what we signed, and how the Canadian government or the provincial government, for that matter, describes us. As one of my cohorts today said, under Mohawk authority, as a citizen of the Mohawk Nation, there are fundamental misconceptions about how we're supposed to discuss issues of this relevance, this nature, and this importance with each other.
The consultations, I think, that we're talking about today are not with an enforcement agency; they're directly with the government officials of Canada, because the properties we occupy, as you say, and the territories that I guess we are considered to occupy at this point are traditional territories. There are fundamental principles that have to go into the relationship-building that has not been happening for 200 years.
So instead of talking about destabilization, you have to take a step back, as the Canadian government, to understand where we're coming from. Responsibility, I can accept. There are some issues that we need to address and are continuing to address within our communities. But the Canadian law aspect is something that really--I'll be polite today--is upsetting for us to hear, from my perspective anyway.