Perhaps I could add, sir, that I think it's important in terms of talking about the handling of classified material. Again, the range of activity that could occur there in terms of misconduct around that material could be in the ordinary course of business of government employee acts--negligence, inattentiveness--which doesn't hit the criminal conduct threshold, and then there is the intentional distribution, espionage-type activity at the other spectrum. So you don't always need a bulldozer to clean out your backyard, and there needs to be an assessment as to what indeed is happening and what are the circumstances that are going on there. But if there's evidence of criminality, we are obligated and duty-bound to investigate that once we have that suggestion.
On June 10th, 2008. See this statement in context.