I can try to answer. I haven't read the entire file, so I do not speak from that experience, but even in the current system and in the new system one important safeguard is the role of the Federal Court.
The Federal Court reviews all of the information and only confirms the validity of the certificate if it is of the view that it is reasonable, based on the evidence it sees. The Federal Court hears the evidence, sees the CSIS agent who has prepared the report or is involved in the preparation of the report, but at the end of the day, the Federal Court is a very important safeguard in addressing the issue. And the Supreme Court never indicated that this part of the Federal Court role was invalid or not reasonable. So that remains. It exists and it remains. What the Supreme Court did was more to say that the fairness towards the individual left something to be desired, but in terms of testing the validity of the information upon which the certificate is based, the Supreme Court did not find any fault.