One of the things that we frequently hear is some issue with respect to the U.K. system, and perhaps what some would view as a shortcoming. My understanding is that the Supreme Court of Canada did look at the U.K. model and had some recommendations. I would feel comfortable, but I would like to hear from you folks that you've looked at the U.K. model. If there are areas that we can improve, can you tell us what they might be, and what differences there are in the two models, the first being proposed here and what the U.K. model is?
On November 27th, 2007. See this statement in context.