First of all, we did look at the U.K. model, particularly with respect to the special advocates. I think when the minister was testifying he indicated some of the differences between what we're proposing and what exists in the U.K. system. Essentially, what we tried to do was to look at the system—and we went mostly from the Supreme Court decision—and as the minister said, we tried to learn lessons that the U.K. had.
Did you want to speak directly to some of the actual differences?